Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Talk about musical instrument construction, setup and repair.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:45 am

ProfChris wrote:Stepping back to the discussion on Chladni patterns, my reading suggests that it's hard, maybe even impossible, to transpose that work to something as tiny as a ukulele. The top, back, sides and bracing interact so much, certainly on sopranos, that I suspect that the research on guitars may not be much use.

But I write from very little practical experience - I've made only a dozen ukes. However, the most recent ones turned out well, in that they are much louder than you'd expect while still producing a good tone. In all of these the back and side vibrate like mad when playing - it's clear that the whole body is working together to make the sound, rather than it coming mainly from the top. This also seems to be true of the good ukes belonging to others which I've played. If the whole body doesn't come alive when playing, it usually sounds pretty meh.

Ultra-light construction seems to be the key, with top/back/sides thickness (in hardwoods) in the 1.5mm to 1.8mm range, and probably at the lower end of that range.

This one looks very nice, both in appearance and in construction (far more accurate than I can manage). I hope it turns out sounding as good - I gather that even for very experienced uke builders, whether it turns out to sound excellent,or merely good, can be rather a lottery.

Searching for the BOING seems like a good strategy!
Thanks for the comments Prof. I had a play around with the tone generator and speaker yesterday once Id closed up the box and results have been interesting. A strong monopole at around 200Hz which would be the Helmoltz frequency of the instrument. The previous day I had a weaker response at around 60Hz but after sanding down the top a bit (now around 1.5mm around lower bout) around it's periphery that response has disappeared. I notice alot of builders seem to go with a live back so I'm going to sand back the periphery of the back to liven it up a bit. The sides ended up a bit on the thick side also so will try and sand back a bit there as well.

All a learning experience....
Martin

jeffhigh
Blackwood
Posts: 1536
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Caves Beach, NSW
Contact:

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by jeffhigh » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:16 pm

I just tap tested my tenor through virtual analyser and got peaks at 204 (air) and 367 (top)

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Fri Jan 27, 2012 12:20 pm

jeffhigh wrote:I just tap tested my tenor through virtual analyser and got peaks at 204 (air) and 367 (top)
Thanks Jeff.
Martin

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:45 pm

Managed to get the topside bindings done today......I'm old fashioned and stubborn so bindings were bent up on an iron which took ages. Hand bending binding and sides on a classical isn't a huge task but on a uke the curve radii are alot tighter. I usually use macrame rope to snug up bindings on my classicals but on the uke I opted for LMI binding tape. My secret weapon is the photographers sealing iron I bought for fitting the top on my lute. This tool is a must have IMHO.....great for heating up and retaping sections of binding that aren't quite snug in the routed channel. The binding I finally decided on...well I don't know exactly what the hell it is but I got it from Tim and it seems to go well with both the sitka top and the tiger myrtle back and sides. In hindsight I should have inserted some bwb purflings behind the binding on the top and back....when installing bare bindings the fit in the channel has to be perfect or gaps become obvious. Purfs give you a bit of leeway of binding fit isn't perfect.
Attachments
P1000362.jpg
P1000364.jpg
P1000366.jpg
Martin

User avatar
68matts
Blackwood
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:34 am
Location: Weston, Hunter Valley

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by 68matts » Fri Jan 27, 2012 9:54 pm

It's coming along nicely, I'm looking forward to seeing it finished, tiger myrtle is one of the most striking timbers imho.
I also done the binding's on a tenor uke today and some purfling would have been very helpful, I've got some gaps you could lose your arm in, nothing a couple of sticks of wax won't hide ( I hope ).
Matt

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:26 pm

Last of the bindings glued in......was that a sh*t of a job! Tomorrow my favourite job...scraping back bindings.
Attachments
P1000371.jpg
P1000369.jpg
Martin

User avatar
Kim
Admin
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: South of Perth WA

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by Kim » Sat Jan 28, 2012 10:04 pm

kiwigeo wrote:The date of the build...22/01/12.....my 54th birthday.
Image

Happy birthday for the 22nd mate, the uke she comes along very nicely indeed 8)
auscab wrote:Is the lining same size as would be used in a guitar ? and what make is it or did you make it?
Hey Rob,

You can make your own kerfed linings quick and easy at what ever dimension and kerf spacing you desire with a Ksled. :wink:

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2443

On the other hand solid linings are pretty good as well.

Cheers

Kim

User avatar
Allen
Blackwood
Posts: 5259
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:39 pm
Location: Cairns, Australia
Contact:

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by Allen » Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:55 am

Ya, everyone thinks because it's a uke, they will be easy to build. Something to get you started on before you jump into the serious business of guitars. I find while a guitar is a bit more time consuming because of the size and extra bracing, a uke is a heck of a lot more challenging to put together. All those curves are just so tight.

It's all looking very sharp and tidy Martin.
Allen R. McFarlen
https://www.brguitars.com
Facebook
Cairns, Australia

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:46 am

Allen wrote:Ya, everyone thinks because it's a uke, they will be easy to build. Something to get you started on before you jump into the serious business of guitars. I find while a guitar is a bit more time consuming because of the size and extra bracing, a uke is a heck of a lot more challenging to put together. All those curves are just so tight.

It's all looking very sharp and tidy Martin.
Thanks Allen,

Many true words there.....I reckon if id succeeded in getting the ebony bindings to bend into those waist bends I'd be up for an Order of Australia Award.

One question Allen....are the backs of you ukes live? This one has a fairly thin back which has a bit of flex in it but Im planning to thin down the periphery of the back to allow more flex.
Martin

User avatar
Allen
Blackwood
Posts: 5259
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:39 pm
Location: Cairns, Australia
Contact:

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by Allen » Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:32 am

Yes. Pretty much every part of a good uke will vibrate like mad. I've had the most success in making them light and lively.
Allen R. McFarlen
https://www.brguitars.com
Facebook
Cairns, Australia

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by auscab » Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:59 pm

[quote="Kim
auscab wrote:Is the lining same size as would be used in a guitar ? and what make is it or did you make it?
Hey Rob,

You can make your own kerfed linings quick and easy at what ever dimension and kerf spacing you desire with a Ksled. :wink:

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=2443


Kim[/quote]


Thanks for the link Kim.
I did find that link It must have been eight months back ? Once I got my head around it and also after seeing Keith McKenzie’s motorized version on Youtube ,I built one. Powered by a 12v windscreen wiper motor from a CF Bedford.

I just have to decide now what type of lining I will cut on the jig and which way I will set it up to do that. I'm thinking of a traditional Martin style Mahogany and also doing a stash of separate "Tentalones "? right name ?

Having the motorized version has been a laugh, set it up turn it on and do a cut on a length of timber and visitors cant believe it . the same reaction I had when I first saw the push manual version then the motorized.
My version is not as slick as Keith’s , a bit more Flintstones influence in it I think.

Martin, Happy 54th for the other day

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:20 pm

Not much work done on the uke today......busy doing other things like thrashing it on my bike and playing the dutiful husband.

All I got done was pulling off the binding tape on the back bindings and doing a quick scrape job on same. The bindings seem to go ok with the Tiger Myrtle.
Attachments
P1000374.jpg
Martin

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:52 pm

Fretboard jigged up and fretted and ready for gluing on.
Attachments
P1000378.jpg
P1000377.jpg
P1000375.jpg
Martin

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by auscab » Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:14 pm

Do you hammer frets in Martin or have you upgraded to a press ?

Or do you think a press is not necessary ?

I keep seeing a type of pipe clamp on E bay that I would think would convert to a decent press for frets, with a bit of a tinker.
Attachments
DSCN0170.jpg

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:17 pm

auscab wrote:Do you hammer frets in Martin or have you upgraded to a press ?

Or do you think a press is not necessary ?

I keep seeing a type of pipe clamp on E bay that I would think would convert to a decent press for frets, with a bit of a tinker.
I'm a hammerer.....I find it helps release tension. I do have a set of Stewmac Jaws cauls for my drill press but havent yet used them.
Martin

User avatar
Kim
Admin
Posts: 4372
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: South of Perth WA

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by Kim » Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:17 pm

That's going to be one classy looking uke Marty, tigerM b&s, bearclaw with tasteful BwbwB rose, ebony FB, Waverley...and a set of Aussie Tonewood's
dnose.jpg
dnose.jpg (9.55 KiB) Viewed 16729 times
bindings!!!!! Man I bet Steph is gonna be thrilled. :D

Cheers

Kim

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:26 pm

Yep Sis' should be happy with the uke.....I'm going to try and get it finished in time for her birthday in March.

It's been an interesting build......a bit more challenging than I thought it would be.

One question for Allen or Jeremy.....what is common compensation at saddle for a tenor uke? Plans I'm using don't appear to have allowed for compensation in placement of bridge (ie saddle shown at theoretical distance from nut not compensated distance).
Martin

ProfChris
Myrtle
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:13 am

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by ProfChris » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:43 am

There's a compensation table here:

http://www.ukuleles.com/Technology/compensate.html

(in inches, but can be converted quite easily).

This suggests around 1mm for G, E and A (if you're using re-entrant tuning) and around 2.5mm for C.

But ukes are very sensitive to different brands of string and to action height, so these are only "thereabouts" figures.

I'd tend to err on the side of over-compensation because a player can simply press a little harder as they go up the neck (and may well do so anyway), thus bringing it up to note.

If, though, you've produced a very low action, and your sister is likely to be a gentle player, then 1mm/2.25mm will probably be about right.

If you don't compensate the C string more then go around 1.5mm for a straight saddle.

Sopranos are much easier in this respect because the ultra-short scale means the intonation is never better than approximate. As a heavy-handed strummer I go for 2.5-3mm action at the 12th, and compensate 3mm.

(and do re-check my numbers before you cut or sand anything!)
Chris Reed

User avatar
Allen
Blackwood
Posts: 5259
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:39 pm
Location: Cairns, Australia
Contact:

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by Allen » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:44 am

I put about the 1mm compensation on but use a 3.2mm saddle so I've got some room to move them back a bit if needed. And as Chris said, they are super sensitive to string brand and all the other things that will affect intonation.
Allen R. McFarlen
https://www.brguitars.com
Facebook
Cairns, Australia

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:03 am

Thanks Chris and Allen. I was aware that string make and type can be a factor.
Martin

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:49 pm

Frickin' hell......spent all yesterday trying to find my Stewmac fret file. Gave up and ordered a new one this morning...went out to the shop and had another look under one of my shelf units and there was the bldi file.
Martin

User avatar
charangohabsburg
Blackwood
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:25 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by charangohabsburg » Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:35 am

The australian luthier community will applaud you Martin: you just made the first step for going to be the first australian Stewmac chain store! :cl
Markus

To be stupid is like to be dead. Oneself will not be aware of it.
It's only the others who suffer.

User avatar
Nick
Blackwood
Posts: 3640
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:20 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by Nick » Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:16 am

kiwigeo wrote:Frickin' hell......spent all yesterday trying to find my Stewmac fret file. Gave up and ordered a new one this morning...went out to the shop and had another look under one of my shelf units and there was the bldi file.
Always the way or the other undies twister is when you chuck something out after it's been taking up shelf space for years & hasn't been used then a week later you want it & you're half an hour into a mad & frustrating hunt before you remembered you've hiffed it. :oops: (usually timber offcuts with me)
"Jesus Loves You."
Nice to hear in church but not in a Mexican prison.

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by kiwigeo » Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:14 pm

Allen wrote:I put about the 1mm compensation on but use a 3.2mm saddle so I've got some room to move them back a bit if needed. And as Chris said, they are super sensitive to string brand and all the other things that will affect intonation.
Allen/Chris,

I propose to position the bridge to front edge of saddle at scale length plus 1.0mm from nut. With a 3.2mm wide saddle this will give me an additional +3.2mm of compensation to play with. Do you see any problems with this plan?


Cheers and thanks Martin
Martin

User avatar
J.F. Custom
Blackwood
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: Steph's Tiger Tenor Uke

Post by J.F. Custom » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:03 pm

kiwigeo wrote:One question for Allen or Jeremy.....
Not much point in me adding anything further on that now... :roll: Sorry for the late pickup Martin but at least you have the answer you wished for.

In any case, it's looking good mate and coming along very quickly too. Surely she is going to love it - Waverley Tuners?? :shock: :D Don't beat around the bush do you?

So that file... DOH! But err, it doesn't happen to be the diamond coated fret file does it? If so, I may be interested if you don't need the two... :mrgreen:

Also had meant to ask where you got that electric photographers sealing iron from? Quite a handy tool I'm thinking.

Finally, out of interest peaked by you and Jeff today, I also checked a Tenor Uke of mine and found it had a peak of 201Hz (air) which seems about appropriate. Low G on a tenor is 196Hz and David Hurd says that approx air res on a Tenor is ~195Hz; though two of his Tenors he shows the frequency graph of were more like 211Hz and 214Hz. See here -

http://www.ukuleles.com/Technology/sounds.html

and here -

http://www.ukuleles.com/SetupnCare/TenorTune.html

My next peak on this instrument was at 396Hz I think (top monopole), which is alongside the (reentrant style tuning) High G found at 392Hz. The two instruments mentioned above that David shows vary even further - they have approx. 340Hz and 390Hz respectively. Some interesting info on tunings and average cumulative string tensions here -

http://www.ukuleles.com/Technology/strings.html

Oh and Happy belated birthday Martin. :gui

Jeremy.

PS - just saw your next post on compensation as I was writing this. I believe what you are suggesting there is exactly what Allen meant he does.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 128 guests