Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Hi all,
Started a new build recently, my third acoustic guitar and 9th overall (I think... if you count a banjo). This will be my first time stepping away from following plans and templates and into the method outlined in the Gore/Gilet books. My background is in engineering so this approach excites me and I'm looking forward to the build process!
It'll be a 12 fret guitar with X bracing and a live back. Not going to include carbon fibre - just keeping the number of new things at a time down.
So far I've collected all of the data on materials and completed the planning stage (spreadsheets, calculations, etc.) To arrive at a design.
Below are the highlights of the details. Any feedback is always appreciated!
Body:
Length - 468mm
Width - 332mm
Scale length - 632mm (24.9")
Soundhole diameter - 89mm
Depth - 100mm
Top (sitka spruce):
E_L - 8.75 GPa
Sound rad coeff - 14.26
Resulting top thickness - 2.36mm
Resulting top mass - 102.81g
Back and sides (white oak):
E_L - 33.82GPa
Sound rad coeff - 6.48
Structure (with braces):
Flexural rigidity - 48.13 Nm2
Peak stress on braces - 31.36MPa
Started a new build recently, my third acoustic guitar and 9th overall (I think... if you count a banjo). This will be my first time stepping away from following plans and templates and into the method outlined in the Gore/Gilet books. My background is in engineering so this approach excites me and I'm looking forward to the build process!
It'll be a 12 fret guitar with X bracing and a live back. Not going to include carbon fibre - just keeping the number of new things at a time down.
So far I've collected all of the data on materials and completed the planning stage (spreadsheets, calculations, etc.) To arrive at a design.
Below are the highlights of the details. Any feedback is always appreciated!
Body:
Length - 468mm
Width - 332mm
Scale length - 632mm (24.9")
Soundhole diameter - 89mm
Depth - 100mm
Top (sitka spruce):
E_L - 8.75 GPa
Sound rad coeff - 14.26
Resulting top thickness - 2.36mm
Resulting top mass - 102.81g
Back and sides (white oak):
E_L - 33.82GPa
Sound rad coeff - 6.48
Structure (with braces):
Flexural rigidity - 48.13 Nm2
Peak stress on braces - 31.36MPa
John
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
That sounds like a great project. Lots of photos would be appreciated.
Good luck
Good luck
Alan
Peregrine Guitars
Peregrine Guitars
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Certainly! Will post some pictures soon. Almost done with back bracing.
John
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Progress so far. Have to finish shaping the back braces and then moving on momentarily. Sides bent last weekend (this oak bends so easily, btw). Will be doing laminated kerfing so that'll be next.
John
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Thanks for the update pics.
One question....you've glued in back braces with the back not trimmed to side outline? Is there a reason for this?
I ask because shaping bracing to fit the dish radius is a bit tricky without trimming to final back shape.
One question....you've glued in back braces with the back not trimmed to side outline? Is there a reason for this?
I ask because shaping bracing to fit the dish radius is a bit tricky without trimming to final back shape.
Martin
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
I radiused all of the braces beforehand - I have a jig for this (I think similar to the one shown in the books, IIRC). Everything glued up in the radius dish with go-bar deck.I ask because shaping bracing to fit the dish radius is a bit tricky without trimming to final back shape.
This is a good question - I wish I had a better answer than just that's the way I learned itOne question....you've glued in back braces with the back not trimmed to side outline? Is there a reason for this?

Am I missing something?

Braces cut to approximate length, then radiused, then glued to top in dish.
John
- Mark McLean
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:03 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
I am like Martin and cut the back into a “guitar shape” before starting to do the bracing. However, I can’t see any problem with the way that you do it as long as it still conforms to the radius that you intend. White oak looks very pretty. Is it heavy?
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
I think it should look nice too. I know the light sides/back isn't everyone's cup of tea but it'll be a good experiment at the very least.White oak looks very pretty. Is it heavy?
It's definitely on the denser side. Measured at 930kg/m3 so a good ~20% more than Indian rosewood.
John
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Bit of progress made last weekend. Glued and carved the X-brace and made the rosette. Finger braces/tone bars/whathaveyou glued up.
John
- WJ Guitars
- Blackwood
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:28 pm
- Location: Sutherland NSW
- Contact:
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Great to see progress on your parlor guitar build. Recently, I have been ask by a client to build a parlor guitar and I am looking at a range of parlor design's dimensions and specifications. In your original post:
100mm diameter
97mm diameter
95mm diameter
I understand that parlor guitar's body are small in size and for a parlor guitar build aiming for the desirable Main low Resonance Frequencies may be difficult to achieve. Maybe reducing the size of the soundhole could slightly help to lower the first low resonance frequency? Are you able to advise what is the background behind choosing the soundhole diameter of 89mm? If the soundhole becomes too small hand access inside the guitar body could be an issue.
Wayne
In my investigations so far I have seen three soundhole sizes:Body:
Length - 468mm
Width - 332mm
Scale length - 632mm (24.9")
Soundhole diameter - 89mm
Depth - 100mm
100mm diameter
97mm diameter
95mm diameter
I understand that parlor guitar's body are small in size and for a parlor guitar build aiming for the desirable Main low Resonance Frequencies may be difficult to achieve. Maybe reducing the size of the soundhole could slightly help to lower the first low resonance frequency? Are you able to advise what is the background behind choosing the soundhole diameter of 89mm? If the soundhole becomes too small hand access inside the guitar body could be an issue.
Wayne
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Hi Wayne. Yeah it's in an effort to keep the helmholtz freq as low as practically possible. I was looking at other folks' parlour builds and seeing 115-125Hz. I've built one before myself and ended up with 123Hz (albeit, before I knew what I was doing). I think the rule of thumb from the books was every 2mm in diameter roughly translates into 2Hz but my goal was just "as small as possible".Are you able to advise what is the background behind choosing the soundhole diameter of 89mm?
It was actually another builder who had done a couple parlours and suggested I do 89mm. It's what I used on my first parlour build too. It's definitely tight getting in there; I anticipate some difficulty if I need to shave down the back brace or add side mass. But I have a lady with small hands that I trust enough to help.

John
- WJ Guitars
- Blackwood
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:28 pm
- Location: Sutherland NSW
- Contact:
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
Thanks John for the information and reasons relate to your decision to have 89mm diameter sound hole.
Its early days for me being my first Parlor Guitar build. The body size that I am using is slightly large than yours and the proposed depth is 112mm at the tail and 86mm at the neck. It will a few more months before I will commence building. I need to make a few more jigs to suit my Parlor guitar build. This will include making some falcate bracing jigs that will work for the Parlor guitar design, plus calculating and making side patterns. See photo below
I will keep an eye on your ongoing posts of your Parlor guitar build progress.
Wayne
Its early days for me being my first Parlor Guitar build. The body size that I am using is slightly large than yours and the proposed depth is 112mm at the tail and 86mm at the neck. It will a few more months before I will commence building. I need to make a few more jigs to suit my Parlor guitar build. This will include making some falcate bracing jigs that will work for the Parlor guitar design, plus calculating and making side patterns. See photo below
I will keep an eye on your ongoing posts of your Parlor guitar build progress.
Wayne
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
I have a falcate braced parlour guitar sitting on the bench awaiting re-finishing. I basically followed a plan for a Gibson parlour. I forget where the top and Helmoltz peaks were. I'll give it a tap test tomorrow and return with the data
Martin
- WJ Guitars
- Blackwood
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:28 pm
- Location: Sutherland NSW
- Contact:
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
That would great Martin to have this data. I also have the Gibson L00 Plans for comparison with the Martin 00-12 Parlor dimensions
Wayne
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
I got busy with domestics today....sorry.
Tap testing first job for tomorrow
Tap testing first job for tomorrow

Martin
- WJ Guitars
- Blackwood
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:28 pm
- Location: Sutherland NSW
- Contact:
Re: Parlour Guitar - first "contemporary" build
See Photo attachment showing dimension comparison between Parlor Guitar 00-12 Martin and Parlor Guitar Gibson.
Wayne
Wayne
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests