Just thinking about it in my head (no scientific fact to back it up

), I'm wondering if sustain will drop off some simply because of the fact that it is a fretless Stu? When you think about it, on a fretted neck the finger frets a note behind the hard metal fret and the string has only a single point of contact at the crown, nothing (hopefully) to impede it's vibration there after. On a fretless your single point of contact is little wider and the area immediately ahead of the contact point must have some of that soft, dampening finger in contact as well.
Whether the sustain difference between fretted & un-fretted is noticeable to most punters, I doubt it.
Has your mate played other fretless basses before? What you've done to the bass (the fine tuning/tweaking) will certainly help but I'm just wondering if you are trying to attain a sustain the customer
thinks (or wants)a fretless should have or whether it is genuinely something in the bass's manufacture/design?
Good luck either way.
