Not here either. At the pace that I move, it feels like I won't get an opportunity to implement the model for years. Hopefully we've reached a consensus by thenJim Kirby wrote:I've gotten too busy myself. In connection with your question, I'm wondering what parameter the main air peak is most sensitive to and whether that is possibly one of the more poorly constrained parameters. The "corrected" model still fits your plot pretty well except for the amplitude of the main air peak.trevtheshed wrote:Thanks for keeping this going everyone, and sorry for not getting back. I took a holiday! Then there's all the other sh!t I've been having to deal with recently (nothing serious, just takes time). Anyway, there's about two days effort to go through all my workings again to check everything term by term. It's that mental fortitude thing... I'll get to it eventually...
Please keep posting.
BTW, has anyone tried yet to fit their version of the model to a guitar frequency response curve?
Direct answer to your question is no, not here. I don't have data that good for any of my builds so far, or any of them still sitting around to thump on.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Steve