Action & relief for C# open setup

Talk about musical instrument construction, setup and repair.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

Post Reply
User avatar
lamanoditrento
Blackwood
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 9:50 am

Action & relief for C# open setup

Post by lamanoditrento » Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:30 pm

I thought I had posted this thread the other night, but it looks like I closed the window before submitting the post.

Anyhoo, that post was ramble; as a second swing: I am setting up a multiscale that the client would like the setup to C# open. The scale is 679. mm bass and 647.7mm on the treble (26.75" & 25.5 in Myanmarian units).

I had an idea and a complicated spreadsheet that used Mottolla's calculations for compensation https://www.liutaiomottola.com/formulae ... sation.htm which overlayed saddle compensation for alternative tunings etc. But which t ended up being a complete waste of time because the action and relief I was targeting were for Open E standard tuning. That is entirely unrealistic for C# open standard.

So, ignoring my overly complicated spreadsheet, given a C# standard open tuning as the default tuning, how would you set it up?
Trent

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10582
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Action & relief for C# open setup

Post by kiwigeo » Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:36 pm

My multiscale commission built for Kym was to be used in a variety of alternate tunings. I ended up just setting up for standard tuning.

You're compensating at saddle only or saddle and nut?
Martin

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10582
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Action & relief for C# open setup

Post by kiwigeo » Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:36 pm

Trent have you tried jigging up a spreadsheet based on Trevors procedure for mathematically modelling the neck/fretboard?
Martin

User avatar
lamanoditrento
Blackwood
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 9:50 am

Re: Action & relief for C# open setup

Post by lamanoditrento » Tue Feb 14, 2023 12:23 am

kiwigeo wrote:
Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:36 pm
My multiscale commission built for Kym was to be used in a variety of alternate tunings. I ended up just setting up for standard tuning.

You're compensating at saddle only or saddle and nut?
It plays beautifully in standard open e at the moment but it just can't work in C# standard. Funnily enough, given all the different scale lengths I did a 'simple intonation fix' and with a 5mm saddle I had intended on doing a conventional saddle compensation with a b string cutoff. The problem is not the compensation, the problem is the desired action and relief. The lower tuning means the string oscillation is larger.

Does anyone have a calculation for the relationship between tension frequency and oscillation?
Trent

User avatar
Trevor Gore
Blackwood
Posts: 1605
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: Action & relief for C# open setup

Post by Trevor Gore » Tue Feb 14, 2023 8:08 am

The amplitude of oscillation is entirely dependent on the pluck displacement. Of course, it takes less force to displace a lower tension string for the same oscillation amplitude of a higher tension string. For the same feel you have to go to a higher tension string set, i.e. heavier strings, which is normal for lower tunings. If you want to use a lot of different tunings on the same instrument, you'll have to find a suitable compromise string set, likely heavier than what you have on now.

User avatar
lamanoditrento
Blackwood
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 9:50 am

Re: Action & relief for C# open setup

Post by lamanoditrento » Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:38 am

Trevor Gore wrote:
Tue Feb 14, 2023 8:08 am
The amplitude of oscillation is entirely dependent on the pluck displacement. Of course, it takes less force to displace a lower tension string for the same oscillation amplitude of a higher tension string. For the same feel you have to go to a higher tension string set, i.e. heavier strings, which is normal for lower tunings. If you want to use a lot of different tunings on the same instrument, you'll have to find a suitable compromise string set, likely heavier than what you have on now.
Ah! Thanks Trevor, so succinctly clarifying! All the convoluted things I had been calculating and didn't think to make the string weight a variable. I had raised the action and relief but it just seemed ludicrous. Excellent, I have 13-57 on so will try maybe something like 15-67 and go from there. Mucho gracious!
Trent

jeffhigh
Blackwood
Posts: 1536
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Caves Beach, NSW
Contact:

Re: Action & relief for C# open setup

Post by jeffhigh » Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:41 pm

Keep the relief low (4 thousandsths of an inch ) IMHO there is nothing to be gained by increasing relief
Probably 14 to 64 strings.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google and 114 guests