When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Talk about musical instrument construction, setup and repair.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

Post Reply
User avatar
nkforster
Blackwood
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:02 am
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by nkforster » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:40 pm

Not a riddle folks but the subject of my latest blog post. Take a look, I'd be interested to hear your take on the subject - what you've learned over the years.

http://www.nkforsterguitars.com/blog/fl ... inder-top/

Image

nigel

http://www.nkforsterguitars.com/book/

Kamusur
Blackwood
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Kamusur » Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:17 pm

I have the answer Nigel, "Definitely when it has a top like yours its not a flat top". At least to my way of thinking building a cylinder top or shape from timber/wood etc seems to make a little more sense as it is only bending in one plane and would have more chance of success ie staying put so to speak than trying to "dome" (in the partial spherical sense) or hold the timber/wood stable in more than one plane. So perhaps we ask or expect a little to much sometimes Nigel.

Steve

Bruce McC
Blackwood
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:29 pm
Location: Canberra ACT Australia

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Bruce McC » Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:08 pm

Hi Nigel

I'd put it down to common usage of the term "flat top guitar", just as we use the term
"acoustic guitar" to distinguish between the way god meant guitars to be and electric guitars.
Bruce Mc.

User avatar
charangohabsburg
Blackwood
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:25 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by charangohabsburg » Fri Aug 02, 2013 8:21 pm

Kamusur wrote:I have the answer Nigel,
I have the other answer: when it is not an archtop (= carved top) it is a flat top. This is how I perceive the term "flat top guitar" generally was used in the past decades, and in spite this is in most cases not technically correct I am not tempted to take part in a linguistic revolution. 8)
Markus

To be stupid is like to be dead. Oneself will not be aware of it.
It's only the others who suffer.

User avatar
nkforster
Blackwood
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:02 am
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by nkforster » Sat Aug 03, 2013 3:39 am

Kamusur wrote:I have the answer Nigel, "Definitely when it has a top like yours its not a flat top". At least to my way of thinking building a cylinder top or shape from timber/wood etc seems to make a little more sense as it is only bending in one plane and would have more chance of success ie staying put so to speak than trying to "dome" (in the partial spherical sense) or hold the timber/wood stable in more than one plane. So perhaps we ask or expect a little to much sometimes Nigel.

Steve
Why do you feel it might have little chance of staying put Steve? My own cylinder top Howe Orme is over 100 years old, it's had a few repairs in that time but it's still in perfect playing condition:

Image

But my main question was chaps - what are your thoughts on the shape you put the soundboard in? Most of us have views on materials, bracing, thicknessing, but what about the actual form?

User avatar
charangohabsburg
Blackwood
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:25 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by charangohabsburg » Sat Aug 03, 2013 6:02 am

nkforster wrote:what are your thoughts on the shape you put the soundboard in?
No special thoughts here, just common knowledge: doming (or also the cylindrical shape I only know from pictures) allows to make a thinner top providing the same strength as a thicker, not domed top, and also is to a certain degree an insurance against cracks due to excessively low RH compared to RH at assembly stage.

Further I believe that different doming shapes also can have a great influence on tonal colouration, but it is beyond my knowledge how much and how exactly which doming degrees and/or shapes have an influence on tone, hence I don't spend too many thoughts on it.
Markus

To be stupid is like to be dead. Oneself will not be aware of it.
It's only the others who suffer.

Kamusur
Blackwood
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Kamusur » Sat Aug 03, 2013 7:04 am

Nigel my vote was for 'easier to constrain the curvature in 1 plane' the cylinder top than the dome.

Steve

User avatar
Taffy Evans
Blackwood
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: Charters Towers North Queensland

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Taffy Evans » Sat Aug 03, 2013 8:43 am

I don't think I've ever noticed a flat top guitar. If the dome radius was not put there by the maker, it's put there over time even if slightly by other forces, strings. I did build a Weisenbourn style guitar with a flat top and back and the plates looked a bit sunken even tho they were flat.
Taff

User avatar
Taffy Evans
Blackwood
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: Charters Towers North Queensland

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Taffy Evans » Sat Aug 03, 2013 9:02 am

Oh!, I meant to add, my understanding is the same as Markus mentioned, If its not arched top guitar its a flat top guitar.
I don't know when the term flat top first came into use but maybe back in the 1920's - 30's it was a quick way of sorting the Gibson L5 style guitars of the day from the Martin Dreadnoughts of the day.
Taff

User avatar
nkforster
Blackwood
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:02 am
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by nkforster » Sat Aug 03, 2013 5:06 pm

Taffy Evans wrote:Oh!, I meant to add, my understanding is the same as Markus mentioned, If its not arched top guitar its a flat top guitar.
I don't know when the term flat top first came into use but maybe back in the 1920's - 30's it was a quick way of sorting the Gibson L5 style guitars of the day from the Martin Dreadnoughts of the day.

I think you're probably right, the name "thin top" might have been more accurate, but doesn't sound as good.

The reason for posting this is to see how many of you are actually experimenting with soundboard structure as a tool for shaping sound, beyond using spherical formers?

It's a really worthy avenue to go down folks. As when you experiment with the shape, it influences so much more - thicknessing (mass), bracing, even materials and decoration. And SOUND!

Here is one of my cylinder tops getting a good thrashing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0zz4Pu8wyU

User avatar
Dennis Leahy
Blackwood
Posts: 872
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:32 am
Location: Duluth, MN, US
Contact:

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Dennis Leahy » Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:09 am

I know Dave White builds using a cylindrical rather than dome shape, and every guitar of his I've heard recorded was "sumptuous"... maybe he can chime in.

Dennis
Another damn Yank!

Parlourman
Sassafras
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:15 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Parlourman » Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:27 pm

I'm really interested in this - i think it looks great.

I am just finding my way into the world of guitar making - I've made my first as per Cumpiano's book - I've just bought the Gore-Gillet books for number two - so maybe a cylinder for number 3?!

Maybe you can elaborate on your technique Nigel and give up some starters - do you have any plans?

Steve

User avatar
Dave White
Blackwood
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:10 am
Location: Hughenden Valley, England
Contact:

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Dave White » Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:54 am

Dennis Leahy wrote:I know Dave White builds using a cylindrical rather than dome shape, and every guitar of his I've heard recorded was "sumptuous"... maybe he can chime in.

Dennis
Dennis,

I don't use "cylindrical" as there is some degree of curvature longitudinally on my instruments but I don't use radius dishes either and the curvature on my tops is complex. My braces are profiled to around 13' radius for the top and 10' radius for the back when glued on but where the tops and backs end up I've never measured. I've never worried about the fingerboard and top being a perfect match and have essentially a floating fingerboard as I believe that the upper bout is an important tone shaping part of the instrument especially for the complexity of the upper harmonics and definitely like a large degree of curvature in this area of the top. My overall scheme of things is to have the top thicker than most in the centre of the lower bout together with curvature to deliver the mids and trebles I want and then hunt out the lower registers from there (easier to do). The higher arching also helps with forward projection of the sound and volume (no need for messy double tops top achieve this).

If you put ladder braces on a top then there will be a degree of longitudinal curvature also and for a true cylindrical shape you have to shape the sides to take this out when you fit the top. Like Nigel I'm a believer of learning the art of shaping the sides to get the complex curvature of the tops and backs that you want. I think radius dishes came in as an easier way of putting the box together (braces rims and everything shaped in them) and don't think that they deliver the sound that I'm hunting down. Also when I read of people talking about 25' as being significant curvature I'm tempted to use an adapted version of the Crocodile Dundee line "That's not a knife . . .". I've always been curious about when using radius dishes came to be the accepted way of making a steel string and according to Somogyi it was the American maker Roy Noble that was the pioneer - at least in modern times a with all things guitar related if you look hard enough there will probably be someone in the 1500's doing a similar thing. :D
Dave White
[url=http://www.defaoiteguitars.com]De Faoite Stringed Instruments[/url]

Kamusur
Blackwood
Posts: 754
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:08 pm

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Kamusur » Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:51 am

Great response Dave and thanks Dennis for asking the question.

Steve

User avatar
nkforster
Blackwood
Posts: 249
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:02 am
Location: Gold Coast
Contact:

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by nkforster » Tue Aug 06, 2013 5:13 am

Parlourman wrote:I'm really interested in this - i think it looks great.

I am just finding my way into the world of guitar making - I've made my first as per Cumpiano's book - I've just bought the Gore-Gillet books for number two - so maybe a cylinder for number 3?!

Maybe you can elaborate on your technique Nigel and give up some starters - do you have any plans?

Steve
I've a couple of Howe Orme's now and will draw up some plans when I learn how to do it on a computer. Does anyone know how? What programs work well for Mac that are free?

Craig Bumgarner
Blackwood
Posts: 195
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:28 pm
Location: Drayden, MD, USA

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Craig Bumgarner » Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:24 am

Interesting thread!

I build Selmer style guitars and one of the main characteristics is the arched top and "pliage" (fold) at the bridge area. The purpose is for the same reason other guitars use arched, domes, cylinders, etc., to provide more stiffness with less weight.

Selmer style guitars have about 7-10mm of arch across the grain, induced by ladder braces. With the grain, they are flat from the head block to the bridge and then the top is folded down to the top piece. The top edge of the sides is straight so this is how the tail of the top gets back down to the sides from the arch in the braces up from the tail. The long grain stiffness is so great that without the pliage, the grain stiffness overcomes the light bracing and much of the arch is lost. The pliage is done with heat before the two top halves are joined. A couple pictures:
Pliage 1.jpg
Arch.jpg

Not all Selmer style guitars have a true pliage, though the originals always did. Many copies avoid this by reducing the arch or thinning up the top enough that it can bend in both directions with (beefier) braces alone. Some builders use radius dishes. The result is often an overly braced top and the high part of dome is up hill of the bridge area, not the ideal location. The pliage takes a little time and practice to make, but once figured out, it makes a world of sense. Keep in mind these guitars have floating bridges and a tail piece like a carved archtop guitar.

In fact it is hard for me to consider Selmer guitars as flat tops, there are so many differences. They are not archtops either. The are, well, Selmer style!

You might know of the DiMauro brothers who built Selmer style guitars in France from the 1940s to the 1960s. One of their guitars is the Chorus model, with a true cylinder top, ladder bracing and f holes instead of a pliage. The edges of the sides vary considerably so the cylinder shaped top can meet the sides without a pliage or otherwise much bending with the grain. These still fall in the family of gypsy guitars and has a similar sound, primarily because of the ladder bracing.
neuvebombe.jpg
neuvebombe.jpg (92.95 KiB) Viewed 18707 times
Craig Bumgarner

Bumgarner Guitar Blog

User avatar
Stephen Kinnaird
Blackwood
Posts: 287
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:45 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: When is a flat top guitar not a flat top?

Post by Stephen Kinnaird » Thu Aug 08, 2013 1:46 pm

Nigel, I use a domed top mainly to get my neck angle geometry to work like I desire.
As a by-product, the tone has become more complex. I really hear more power in the mids, and a *lusher* sound overall. The true flat tops we've built have more force in the bass, generally, so as you say it becomes a tool to zero in on a customer's needs.

Steve
There are some great woods, down under!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests