Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Talk about musical instrument construction, setup and repair.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by auscab » Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:19 pm

I have this 73 Martin 00-21 and I have been thinking for
some time that it may be a cedar top, can any one tell by
these pictures if it is cedar ? or what type of spruce?
And if Cedar would it be W/R cedar that has faded ?
It has a strong Pine / resin type smell on the inside.
The smell is like what you get sitting in a sauna.
Attachments
IMG_6044.jpg
IMG_6056.jpg

jeffhigh
Blackwood
Posts: 1536
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Caves Beach, NSW
Contact:

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by jeffhigh » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:06 pm

I have never heard of a cedar topped Martin. in that era I would expect it to be sitka spruce.
It may have spanish cedar linings (neither really cedar or spanish) if it has a strong smell .

GregL
Blackwood
Posts: 229
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:01 am
Location: Lismore, NSW

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by GregL » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:27 pm

Hi Rob,

Can you look at the underside of the top - maybe with a little mirror? You might get a better idea what the top wood is?
I'm guessing that Western Red cedar has been used on some Martin guitars (sorry Jeffhigh). I have seen several Western Red cedar topped Martins mentioned on the internet, and I saw a Western Red cedar top when on a Martin guitar factory tour in 2005, though I can't tell what your top wood is.

Thanks,
GregL.

jeffhigh
Blackwood
Posts: 1536
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Caves Beach, NSW
Contact:

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by jeffhigh » Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:55 pm

Looks like sitka to me, most of the colour will be from the aging of the nitrocellulose lacquer anyhow.WRC would be very dark by now
I had a '76 D28 that looked like that.
Other than HPL or mahogany tops there was the occasional Koa but it is none of those.

jeffhigh
Blackwood
Posts: 1536
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:50 am
Location: Caves Beach, NSW
Contact:

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by jeffhigh » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:04 pm

Apparently there was a limited run of cedar topped HD-28's which are not highly regarded.
I guess a custom order could have cedar, but really it does not look like it.

User avatar
Mark McLean
Blackwood
Posts: 1088
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Mark McLean » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:11 pm

Definitely looks like sitka. And there aren't many cedar topped Martins out there. Cedar tops, at the age of nearly 40, are usually very suntanned to deep brown, and also very dinged (it is so soft). Cool guitar!

Paul B

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Paul B » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:19 pm

Never heard of WRC getting lighter with age. Darker, yes.

User avatar
Mark McLean
Blackwood
Posts: 1088
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Mark McLean » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:30 pm

And I forgot to mention - that's a very nice sideboard also!

User avatar
Kim
Admin
Posts: 4376
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: South of Perth WA

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Kim » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:02 pm

Mark McLean wrote:Definitely looks like sitka. And there aren't many cedar topped Martins out there. Cedar tops, at the age of nearly 40, are usually very suntanned to deep brown, and also very dinged (it is so soft). Cool guitar!
+1 8)

Bruce McC
Blackwood
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:29 pm
Location: Canberra ACT Australia

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Bruce McC » Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:30 am

Hi Rob

Try http://www.martinguitars.com
There is a catalogue of their guitars on this site.
Bruce Mc.

Bruce McC
Blackwood
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:29 pm
Location: Canberra ACT Australia

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Bruce McC » Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:34 am

Sorry try http://www.martinguitar.com
leave out the "s"
Bruce Mc.

simso
Blackwood
Posts: 1768
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:36 pm
Location: Perth WA

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by simso » Wed Apr 25, 2012 11:30 am

Yep, nicely aged spruce.

Now the sideboard on the other hand....Mmm what could I make with that wood
Steve
Master of nothing,

Do your own repairs - http://www.mirwa.com.au/How_to_Series.html

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by auscab » Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:35 pm

That would be one pile of expensive bad tone wood. :lol:

Ok , Sitka Spruce it is .
WRC gets darker with age ,I didn’t know that ,Glad I asked the question.

The growth rings in the top are about 1mm apart and any Sitka I have bought is not that close , so it’s a fine grained example of Sitka that Martin would have access to I would suppose ?

The smell ??
The linings are the typical neat Mahogany. Braces look like spruce.
I might see if I can get a good picture of the inside under the top with my three fold mirror and put it up.
Just to be sure. And for interests sake.

The saddle has been shaved a bit by the look of it to lower the action .It’s a nice little guitar that sounds good, I would like to have heard it’s sound when the saddle was at the right height. I rested a straight edge along the fret board down to the bridge following Frank fords instructions and the straight edge sits below the bridge by approximately 3 to 4 mm. So it will need a neck re set one day. Id rather build some like it than pull this apart , but if it stops working ??

User avatar
Mark McLean
Blackwood
Posts: 1088
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Mark McLean » Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:23 pm

Rob
That saddle is pretty low. There is not muck break angle left on the 3rd and 4th strings. You could cut some string ramps to improve the bearing pressure of those strings on the saddle. It might deliver a bit more volume and punch. How is the action?

A neck reset is like a valve grind in an old engine, or prostate surgery in an ageing luthier (OK, not you Lillian). It is an almost inevitable requirement for continuing usefulness, and we should not shy away from it. That Martin is a great looking instrument and it should have many more years of joyful music left in it. But, your straightedge experiment is demonstrating a significant neck alignment problem. If the action is getting high and it is no longer a joy to play (as it should be), bite the bullet. You will smile every time you pick it up after it has the surgery.

The sauna smell? Could be the spruce. But we all know cedar when we smell it don't we? Has it ever had those cedar ball things (moth repellers) stored in the case? You sure the kerfings aren't cedar?

cheers
Mark

User avatar
Lillian
Blackwood
Posts: 1705
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:31 pm
Location: New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Lillian » Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:45 pm

Mark McLean wrote:Rob
That saddle is pretty low. There is not muck break angle left on the 3rd and 4th strings. You could cut some string ramps to improve the bearing pressure of those strings on the saddle. It might deliver a bit more volume and punch. How is the action?

A neck reset is like a valve grind in an old engine, or prostate surgery in an ageing luthier (OK, not you Lillian). It is an almost inevitable requirement for continuing usefulness, and we should not shy away from it. That Martin is a great looking instrument and it should have many more years of joyful music left in it. But, your straightedge experiment is demonstrating a significant neck alignment problem. If the action is getting high and it is no longer a joy to play (as it should be), bite the bullet. You will smile every time you pick it up after it has the surgery.

The sauna smell? Could be the spruce. But we all know cedar when we smell it don't we? Has it ever had those cedar ball things (moth repellers) stored in the case? You sure the kerfings aren't cedar?

cheers
Mark

:lol:

User avatar
J.F. Custom
Blackwood
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by J.F. Custom » Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:51 pm

auscab wrote:I might see if I can get a good picture of the inside under the top with my three fold mirror and put it up.
Just to be sure. And for interests sake.
On that note, another option to consider. You could use a high power handheld light. If you can rig up a light that you can put inside, you can turn it on, with the lights off (at night) and take a photo as this will give you a blueprint/xray of the bracing used in that particular instrument.

Just a thought... for interests sake. 8)

Jeremy.

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by auscab » Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:07 am

That would be interesting Jeremy, I’ve seen it done and yes I’d like to do it, I took my tripod in to do it months back but never got any further.

What do I do once I’m looking at the picture of the bracing silhouette on my screen though ? How do I transfer that to paper? Me and my printer aren’t talking to each other at the moment! I refuse to after I found out I had bought a machine that would refuse to scan with one empty cartridge of ink in it.
I don’t think I have the patience to figure out how to scale it up and be sticking sections together. If that’s possible.

I will ring Officeworks and see if they can scale up a picture to correct size off a memory card?

User avatar
charangohabsburg
Blackwood
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:25 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by charangohabsburg » Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:44 am

auscab wrote:What do I do once I’m looking at the picture of the bracing silhouette on my screen though ? How do I transfer that to paper?
One possibility is that you skip the screen and camera:
Don't use the hottest light bulb you can find (5 Watt cold light is plenty enough), this will give you more time before you damage the varnish of the back... Lay out some paper on the top and mark the end positions of the braces (in the dark, with the light in the guitar turned on, of course). It helps if you draw the outline of the guitar to the paper before starting the dark room action. After that, connect the marked brace ends on the paper. Done. No printer needed.

If you want to hone your computer skills you can use the photograph as a reference image for a CAD drawing. Something like this here.
Markus

To be stupid is like to be dead. Oneself will not be aware of it.
It's only the others who suffer.

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by auscab » Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:02 am

12 Volt led might be good ? bright with no heat .

User avatar
charangohabsburg
Blackwood
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:25 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by charangohabsburg » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:47 am

Today LED lights are bright. If you have one try it. If you don't have one, instead of buying one just to see if it is enough or not you also can do what I have done some years ago (and is what I still use):

Image

The wire keeps the bulb away from the wood which even with a weak, not so hot bulb is a good thing if using it for more than only a couple of minutes, but also means you can damage the soundhole borders if not handling it carefully when getting it in and out of the instrument.

I also use it for reasonable lighting when using the webcam for doing internal surgery.
Markus

To be stupid is like to be dead. Oneself will not be aware of it.
It's only the others who suffer.

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by auscab » Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:34 pm

Thanks Markus, and Jeremy, you have inspired me to get out the gear and wire it up .That tip with the light inside and the paper on top is going to work perfectly.I tried that first then took pictures.
Attachments
IMG_8607.JPG
IMG_8599.JPG
Copy of IMG_8604.JPG

User avatar
charangohabsburg
Blackwood
Posts: 1818
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:25 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by charangohabsburg » Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:54 pm

Glad it works for you.
Good to see you recognised one has to cover the holes for a good contrast. Excellent photographs! :cl

I forgot to mention that it seems that guitar tops made of Western Red Cedar and Sequoia (and maybe very few other conifers) are not translucent. Just as a side note.
Markus

To be stupid is like to be dead. Oneself will not be aware of it.
It's only the others who suffer.

User avatar
J.F. Custom
Blackwood
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by J.F. Custom » Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:56 pm

Cool. 8)

Nice work Rob.

Jeremy.

User avatar
auscab
Blackwood
Posts: 650
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:12 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by auscab » Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:09 pm

:oops: And it looks nothing like the colour of any cedar I have on the inside.
I think the smell I got may have been from moth balls or something like that. It was stronger when I first got it, 1 year ago.
And I think the smell is stronger when it is first pulled from its case after sitting in there for long periods. It's been out of its case quite a bit over the last three days and yesterday I was not getting the smell at all
Also I didn't realize Sitka could be so close with it's annular growth rings,I used to work with a fair bit of hemlock and that came in fine and wide rings come to think of it seen the same with Oregon .
lesson learned ,thanks.
Attachments
IMG_8615.JPG
IMG_8614.JPG
IMG_8613.JPG

Corky Long
Wandoo
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:43 am
Location: Mount Kisco, NY

Re: Martin 73 00-21 Top timber?

Post by Corky Long » Tue May 01, 2012 5:12 am

More concurrence that it's most likely Sitka. I'm not sure when they stopped using Adirondack - probably in the 50s?

Just one more comment on the appearance of Sitka = I've got some Sitka tops that are a good bit tighter (in terms of growth rings) than those. Really need a strong magnifying glass to measure them. Sitka can grow everywhere from Californi all the way to Alaska - I'd imagine that in the further northern reaches, the growth rings get very, very tight. (some of the nicest I have are from Alaska) - not sure where Martin was sourcing their tops at that point.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google and 290 guests