Post
by peter.coombe » Fri Oct 22, 2010 5:58 pm
I have sent probably around 70 or 80 mandolins and mandolas to the USA and Europe. With one or two exceptions I have always used DHL. I tried UPS, but that shipment was nothing but trouble and never used them again. I have never used Aussie Post becasue of the package size restrictions, insurance uncertainty, and Australian and USA Customs can be a PITA to deal with. DHL handle all the Customs stuff so is much easier. Unfortunately the costs have escalated to such an extent that I am considering using Aussie Post for the next shipment. DHL charge on a volumetric basis, so padding costs as much as the space taken up by the instrument. Less padding means higher risk. With one exception, DHL have been reliable and usually quick. If I drop off a package to the DHL depot in Canberra, it will arrive at it's destination in the USA 2-3 working days later. That assumes no delays in USA Customs. The one exception was a mandolin that got delayed in USA Customs for a week during a LA heat wave. I had no idea LA was experiencing a heat wave at the time. Why it was delayed I don't know, but it arrived with some serious heat damage. I had insured it with DHL and claimed on insurance. It took a while, but the insurance company agreed it was damaged and paid out in full and I was able to refund the customer in full. I was lucky in that I had pictures of the undamaged mandolin taken a few days before I shipped it. So, DHL insurance does work, but I would recommend you photograph it and pack it well.
I am not advocating you use DHL because the costs are now ridiculous, but it does to a large extent boil down to how much risk you are willing to take. Pay more and the risk is likely to be less. Personally I prefer to take less risk and use something that is tried and proven, and even subsidise the customer to some extent on the costs so as to lower the risk. An instrument that gets damaged in transit or is delayed for some unkown reason can be a very stressful and time consuming thing both for you and the customer to have to get through.
I now live in a small country town on the far south coast of NSW. DHL don't have a depot here, but they can pick up. However, the last time I used their pickup it took 5 days for the package just to get to Sydney. Not only that, but they "lost" the Customs forms, even though I gave them 3 copies. I would rather drive to Canberra and deliver to DHL Canberra than to use their pickup form Bega. The problem is in country areas they subcontract to local carriers who are not exactly famous for their efficiency. Things happen slowly in the country.
No doubt about it, it is getting more and more difficult to export musical instruments. Costs of transport are escalating and there is increasing amount of documentation the USA government requires. There is a free trade agreement in place (FTA), but occasionally USA Customs will charge import duty as a risk control measure. If that happens you then need to supply documentation to your customer that proves the instrument you made conforms to the rules of the FTA, and they need to foreward it to USA Customs. Unfortunately the FTA is the most unbelievably complicated document that will take you days to decipher. There is a different rule that applies to each good, and you need to work out the appropriate rule. In the case of mandolins and guitars thankfully the rules are the same, but from memory there are 3 rules that apply and you need to choose the most appropriate rule that applies in your particular individual case. Instruments of the violin family have completely different rules. The FTA agreement is different from other FTA's and USA Customs officials are not necessarily familiar with the rules and can demand documentation that cannot possibly exist under the USA/Australia FTA.
Added to this is now the requirement to document every single species, the country of origin, and the weight of each species of wood that is incorporated into your instrument if the value is over $2500. This IMHO is nothing but a form of trade restriction, and is a clever way of getting around the aims of the FTA. Who among us does document the weight of every piece of wood that we incorporate into our instruments? Do any of us know the species name and the country of harvest of the Ebony we use? Personally, after a long period of mostly trouble free exporting, I am beginning to wonder if it is all really worthwhile now. I hate the paperwork, and the most recent requirements is definately an example of ridiculous bureaucratic paperwork that will acheive precisely nothing except to create a paper mountain and employ bureaucrats to shuffle the paper mountain. Then maybe that is what they want to achieve??