Daniel_M wrote:
Some food for thought….I was speaking to buddy last night who is a professional luthier and he is always on the look out for more suppliers of tone wood (he has WAS in a bad way).
I actually mentioned this supplier and when he asked about how I found out about him I mentioned this forum and the good experience that people have had and reported on here. Rightly or wrongly, I would suggest that he now associates this forum with that supplier –I am not suggesting that there are business links between the two or anything similar. It is just a link that people will inherently form in their own minds.
Daniel.
Precisely my concern Daniel,
I do understand that Allen started this thread in good faith as a result of a good experience he had with Parek Exports, but reading all of the glowing endorsements that have followed which I am sure are more the result of provocation from the urgings of Mr Parek than they are of people feeling a genuine need within themselves to sing his praises, I thought it was time for a little balance so that should someone on this forum in future 'not' be so 'over the moon' happy with goods received, it cannot reflect badly upon this forum by association which could quite easily be the case should we allow an open topic relating specifically to this particular vendor to be censored in such a way that it only supports his venture.
After initially joining this forum and making his first post nothing but spam, this bloke had to be told a number of times there after not to pimp his wood here as he is not a preferred vendor of this forum. I also seem to recall that he was pulled up for spamming our membership list via PM and email harvesting 'after' he was told not to do so. He had then approached the moderators team of this forum via Allen requesting that he be considered as a preferred vendor however he was not accepted. I voted against enlisting this vendor because there is evidence, most of which is readily available via a Google search, to suggest this vendor does not meet selection criteria for association with the ANZLF. There was further evidence that this particular vendor had 3rd party association in a group buy at this forum which not only turned sour, but soured the prospect of further group buys being arranged through the ANZLF which is very sad because this was one of the core reasons for this forums inception.
During my "sprouting off" I have asked very relevant questions of this vendor in relation to his refusal to accept Paypal payments which remain to this point unanswered. In fact it is fair to say that this vendor has been somewhat misleading in providing those excuses so far furnished. In light of what I have read elsewhere on internet forums, and my own negative experience that was contributed to by this vendor, I remain of the view that the only answer to the question of 'why' this vendor refuses to use Paypal is to negate any chance of a fair and equitable resolution in case of a disputed transaction.
As suggested earlier, I will gladly post my own negative findings about this vendor openly in this thread at 'his' request...but I must say that he has become conspicuous by his absence since I first made that invitation. I will also add that I agree our members should feel free to buy their wood from whom ever they choose however it should also be understood that this forum is not a free resource to be used as a billboard by those uninvited to do so. No one pays me for the time I put in as one of the admin team of this forum when I get in and help people out with the day to day of the ANZLF. I am not prepared to have that time and effort exploited by someone whom I feel is not worthy. Have your own opinion and make your own choices by all means, but please do not attempt to stifle mine, because in the context of this particular thread, they are not only valid, but add the balance required to allow people to know that should they buy from this particular vendor, it is indeed their own choice to do so and has nothing whatsoever to do with the ANZLF.
Cheers
Kim